UDC 332.33
The article provides a comparative analysis of successful land management practices in different countries, covering both developed and developing economies, as well as states with a transitional economic model. The aim of the study is to identify the key factors that determine the efficiency of land use and approaches that promote the sustainable development of territories. Particular attention will be paid to the analysis of indicators such as the level of urbanisation, the share of agricultural land in the total structure of land use, the index of transparency of land transactions and the level of land conflicts, as well as economic efficiency, which reflects the financial return from the use of land resources. Germany and the USA, representing developed economies, China as an emerging economy and Singapore as an example of a developing country with unique land use conditions, are selected for comparative analysis. Based on a detailed review of data and the application of the case-study method, the best land management practices in these countries are highlighted. The analysis covers a wide range of aspects, including the use of modern GIS technology, land tenure reforms and the use of market-based approaches. The results of the study show that successful land management requires an integrated approach that takes into account economic, social and environmental aspects. The article shows how different countries achieve high land use efficiency by adapting their strategies to specific conditions and challenges. The findings can be useful for developing and improving land management strategies in other regions and countries, as well as for further research in the field of sustainable land use and regional development.
land management, comparative analysis, land use, urbanisation, agricultural land, land reforms, GIS technologies, international experience, economic efficiency, transparency of land transactions
1. Meschaninova E.G., Goncharova I.Yu., Tkacheva O.A. Sovershenstvovanie upravleniya zemel'nymi resursami na regional'nom urovne. Novocherkassk: OOO "Lik", 2015. 128 s. EDN RYCJYS.
2. Boltanova E.S. Zemel'noe pravo: uchebnik. M.: RIOR, 2009. 553 s.;
3. Erofeev B.V. Zemel'noe pravo Rossii: uchebnik. 9-e izd., pererab. M.: Yurayt-Izdat, 2004. 656 s.
4. Tihomirov Yu.A. Vlast' i upravlenie v socialisticheskom obschestve. M.: Yuridicheskaya literatura, 1968. 199 s.
5. Syrodoev N.A. Zemel'noe pravo. Kurs lekciy: uchebnoe posobie. M.: Prospekt, 2009. 368 s.
6. Antipin I.A., Vlasova N.Yu., Ivanova O.Yu. (2023). Strategicheskoe planirovanie regionov Rossiyskoy Federacii: voprosy prostranstvennogo razvitiya // Upravlenec. T. 14, № 6. S. 50–62. DOI:https://doi.org/10.29141/2218-5003-2023-14-6-4. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/CDKHUU
7. Vsemirnyy bank // Oficial'nyy sayt URL: https://www.worldbank.org/ext/en/home (data obrascheniya: 12.03.2025).
8. Evropeyskaya komissiya // Oficial'nyy sayt URL: https://commission.europa.eu/index_en (data obrascheniya: 11.03.2025).
9. Evrostat // Oficial'nyy sayt URL: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat (data obrascheniya: 11.03.2025).
10. Indeks vospriyatiya korrupcii // Mirovaya ekonomika URL: https://www.worldeconomics.com/Indicator-Data/Corruption/Corruption-Perceptions-Index.aspx (data obrascheniya: 11.03.2025).
11. Ministerstvo yusticii SShA // Oficial'nyy sayt URL: https://www.justice.gov/ (data obrascheniya: 11.03.2025).
12. Nacional'noe byuro statistiki Kitaya // Oficial'nyy sayt URL: https://www.stats.gov.cn/english/ (data obrascheniya: 11.03.2025).
13. Organizaciya Ob'edinennyh Naciy // Oficial'nyy sayt URL: https://www.un.org/ru/ (data obrascheniya: 12.03.2025).
14. Statisticheskoe upravlenie Singapura // Oficial'nyy sayt URL: https://www.singstat.gov.sg/ (data obrascheniya: 11.03.2025).
15. FAO (Prodovol'stvennaya i sel'skohozyaystvennaya organizaciya OON) // Oficial'nyy sayt URL: https://www.fao.org/home/ru (data obrascheniya: 11.03.2025).
16. Transparency International // Oficial'nyy sayt URL: https://transparency.eu/our-mission/ (data obrascheniya: 11.03.2025).
17. USDA (Ministerstvo sel'skogo hozyaystva SShA) // Oficial'nyy sayt URL: https://www.usda.gov/ (data obrascheniya: 11.03.2025).
18. Goncharova, M. N. Economic Conflicts as a Possible Destabilizing Factor for Sustainable Development of the Territory / M. N. Goncharova, V. A. Blaginin // Proceedings of the Second Conference on Sustainable Development: Industrial Future of Territories (IFT 2021), Ekaterinburg, 24 sentyabrya 2021 goda / Editors: Yakov Silin. – Ekaterinburg: Atlantis Press, 2021. – P. 279-282. – DOIhttps://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.211118.050. – EDN NWSMMI.
19. Antipin I.A., Vlasova N.Yu., Shishkina E.A. (2024). Cifrovye tehnologii v razvitii territoriy: vozmozhnosti i problemy primeneniya v praktike gosudarstvennogo i municipal'nogo upravleniya // Upravlenec. T. 15, № 6. S. 17–29. DOI:https://doi.org/10.29141/2218-5003-2024-15-6-2. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/DNMGAN.
