Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
UDC 338.436.33
The article presents the results of identifying the structural features of the activities of categories of rural farms depending on the type of products produced, which is the purpose of scientific research. The object of the research is the activities of various participants in the agricultural market, the subject is the system of relations in the field of forming the structure of yields and livestock in the agricultural sector. The research methods used in the scientific article are: methods of structural analysis and time series analysis, methods of graphical data analysis (infographics). The place of research is the Russian Federation. The scientific novelty of the study can be considered the application of the method of graphical data analysis to characterize the identified imbalances in the dynamics of the structure of agricultural activity of all categories in the context of crop production and animal husbandry. As a result, the unevenness of crop yields and livestock dynamics has been established in the context of various categories of agricultural entities. The structure of the gross harvest of crop production in general is dominated by grain crops; At the same time, it should be noted a significant increase in the share of peasant (farm) farms (by 30 percentage points compared to 1992). Personal subsidiary farms dominate in the categories of «potatoes» and «outdoor and indoor vegetables», which is due to the lack of expressed commercial interest from large companies due to the higher labor intensity of the corresponding production processes. In animal husbandry, the leading positions are occupied by large agricultural organizations, which account for 50-90% of the total livestock; The exception is sheep farming, where the share of private farms accounts for slightly less than 50% of the total volume. As a result, the assessment of the cumulative change in the structure allowed us to rank the types of farms by the size of the share in individual types of crop and livestock production (in descending order): agricultural organizations, private farms, peasant (farmer) farms, and individual entrepreneurs.
statistics, analysis, dynamics of structure, crop production, livestock farming
1. Sidorin A.A., Polyakova A.A., Alent'eva N.V., Kozhanchikova N.Yu. Sovremennoe sostoyanie i perspektivy razvitiya APK Rossii // Vestnik agrarnoy nauki. 2024. № 6(111). S. 148-155.
2. Breus M.V. Teoreticheskie aspekty razvitiya strategii importozamescheniya v agropromyshlennom komplekse Rossiyskoy Federacii // Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Politicheskie, sociologicheskie i ekonomicheskie nauki. 2025. T. 10. № 2(36). S. 229-236. DOI:https://doi.org/10.21603/2500-3372-2025-10-2-229-236
3. Sergienko E.G., Korshikova M.V., Chernobay N.B. Aktual'nye problemy upravleniya agrarnym sektorom na sovremennom etape ekonomicheskogo razvitiya // Politematicheskiy setevoy elektronnyy nauchnyy zhurnal Kubanskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta. 2017. № 127. S. 308-317. DOI:https://doi.org/10.21515/1990-4665-127-019
4. Suhanov I.V., Plyuschikov V.G. Kachestvennye podhody k ocenke finansovoy ustoychivosti predpriyatiy agropromyshlennogo kompleksa (na primere ZAO «Petelinskaya pticefabrika» i OAO «Kurinoe carstvo») // Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Agronomiya i zhivotnovodstvo. 2013. № 1. S. 5-11.
5. Sergeeva N.V. Finansovaya podderzhka malogo agrarnogo biznesa // Vestnik Kurskoy gosudarstvennoy sel'skohozyaystvennoy akademii. 2024. № 1. S. 240-243.
6. Fomin A.A., Mamontova I.Yu. Sostoyanie zemel'nyh i vodnyh resursov planety i metody ustoychivogo vedeniya sel'skogo hozyaystva // Mezhdunarodnyy sel'skohozyaystvennyy zhurnal. 2022. № 4(388). S. 420-422. DOI:https://doi.org/10.55186/258767402022654420
7. Pugachev N.A., Gamburcev S.D., Fomin A.A., Syamina E.I. Perspektivy primeneniya tehnologiy iskusstvennogo intellekta v sel'skom hozyaystve // Moskovskiy ekonomicheskiy zhurnal. 2024. T. 9. № 1. DOI:https://doi.org/10.55186/2413046X20239164
8. Fomin A.A., Stratichuk D.A. Formirovanie sistemy ustoychivogo razvitiya agrarnogo biznesa // International Agricultural Journal. 2024. T. 67. № 1. DOI:https://doi.org/10.55186/258767402024871
9. Altuhov A.I., Volkov S.N., Sorokina O.A. Klassifikaciya neispol'zuemyh zemel' sel'skohozyaystvennogo naznacheniya dlya vovlecheniya v oborot na osnove GIS-tehnologiy // Ekonomika sel'skohozyaystvennyh i pererabatyvayuschih predpriyatiy. 2025. № 10. S. 3-9. DOI:https://doi.org/10.31442/0235-2494-2025-0-10-3-9
10. Volkov S.N., Krasnyanskaya E.V. Organizaciya racional'nogo ispol'zovaniya zemel' sel'skohozyaystvennogo naznacheniya v Rossiyskoy Federacii i neobhodimost' ee zemleustroitel'nogo obespecheniya // Mezhdunarodnyy zhurnal agrarnoy nauki i obrazovaniya. 2025. № 1(5). S. 102-109.
11. Aimurzina B., Kamenova M., Omarova A. [et al.] Particular forms of management of Agro–Industrial complex in the sustainable development of agriculture // Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism. 2018. Vol. 9. No. 3(27). P. 639-647. DOI:https://doi.org/10.14505/jemt.9.3(27).24
12. Yakupova R.A. Innovative processes in the agro-industrial complex // Spirit Time. 2021. No. 8(44). P. 16-18.
13. Materialy sayta Federal'noy sluzhby gosudarstvennoy statistiki.
