Russian Federation
Issues related to national competitiveness have been the subject of research in most economic theories since A. Smith, and there is still an extreme ambiguity of opinions in the scientific and political community on issues related to the creation and maintenance of the competitiveness of states. The purpose of this paper is to consider different approaches to the definition of the national competitiveness concept and to trace their relationship with the main theoretical schools in the field of World / International Trade, Macroeconomic Development and Economic Growth.
country competitiveness, Diamond Model of National Competitiveness, state policy, sustainable development
1. Dyumulen I.I. Mezhdunarodnaya torgovlya. Ekonomika, politika, praktika. -M.: VAVT Minekonomrazvitiya Rossii, 2015. - 464s.
2. Makkredi K. Bogatstvo narodov Adama Smita. - Popurri, 2010. - 160 s.
3. Shimko P. D. Mezhdunarodnaya ekonomika : uchebnik dlya akademicheskogo bakalavriata / P. D. Shimko, N. I. Didenko ; pod red. P. D. Shimko. - M. : Yurayt, 2014. - 752 s.
4. Aiginger K., & Vogel J. 2015. Competitiveness: From a misleading concept to a strategy supporting Beyond GDP goals // Competitiveness Review, 25(5): P. 502.
5. Anca H. Literature review of the evolution of competitiveness concept. 2008. URL: <http://steconomiceuoradea.ro/anale/volume/2012/n1/004.pdf> (dostup: 18/10/2018)
6. Bhawsar P., Chattopadhyay U. Competitiveness: Review, Reflections and Directions // Global Business Review, Vol. 16, Issue 4. PP. 665-679.
7. Chaudhuri S., Ray S. The Competitiveness Conundrum: Literature Review and Reflections // Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 32, Issue No. 48, 29 Nov, 1997. PP. M83-M91.
8. Cho D. S., Moon H. C., Kim M. J. Characterizing international competitiveness in international business research: A MASI approach to national competitiveness // Research in International Business and Finance, 22, 2008. PP. 175-192.
9. De Grauwe P. Introduction. In P. De Grauwe (Ed.), Dimensions of competitiveness. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2010.
10. Delgado M., Ketels C., Porter M. E., Stern S. The Determinants of National Competitiveness // NBER Working Paper No. 18249, July 2012.
11. Dunning J. H. Internationalizing Porter’s Diamond // Management International Review, 33, 1993. PP. 7-15.
12. European Competitiveness Report, 2000
13. Krugman P. Pop Internationalism. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1996. 89 p.
14. Krugman P., Competitiveness: A Dangerous Obsession // Foreign Affairs, 1994, Vol. 73(2), PP. 28-44.
15. Krugman P., Obstfeld, M. International economics: Theory and policy (4th ed.). New York: Harper Collins, 2003.
16. Lachmann W. Improving the international competitiveness of nations. WEP Working Paper, 6, 2001. PP. 1-21.
17. Mulatu A. On the concept of «competitiveness» and its usefulness for policy // Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 36, 2016. PP. 50-62.
18. OECD Programme on technology and the Economy, 1992.
19. Olczyk M. A systematic retrieval of international competitiveness literature: a bibliometric study. Eurasian Economic Review, 6, 2016. PP. 429-457.
20. Porter M. E. The competitive advantage of nations. London: MacMillan, 1990.
21. Porter M. E., Van der Linde, C. Toward a new conception of the environment - Competitiveness relationship // Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9, 1995. PP. 97-118.
22. Smit A.J. The competitive advantage of nations: is Porter’s Diamond Framework a new theory that explains the international competitiveness of countries? //Southern African Business Review, Vol. 14, Number 1, 2010. PP. 105-130.
23. The Report of the President’s Commission on Competitiveness, 1984.
24. Tyson L. Who’s Bashing Whom? Trade Conflict in High-Technology Industries. Institute of International Economics, Washington, DC, 1992.
25. Weresa M. A. Preface. In M. A. Weresa (Ed.), Poland: Competitiveness Report 2015. The role of economic policy and institutions: 7-8. Warsaw: Warsaw School of Economics Press, 2016.
